top of page
Green Harvester Working

Wheat-Soybean Relay Intercropping: Proof of Concept

Question: How does relay intercropped wheat-soybean compare to standard soybean and double-crop wheat-soybean?

Responsible graduate student: Yuri Gross (yuribgross@ksu.edu)

Locations
image.png

Ottawa, Kansas

Manhattan, Kansas

Scandia, Kansas

Factors Evaluated
  • System: standard soybean, standard wheat, relay intercropped wheat-soybean, double cropped wheat-soybean

  • Soybean planting date: April/May vs May/June (relay and standard)

  • Soybean genotype: 3.7 MG vs 4.2 MG

Measurements
  • Yield (wheat and soybean)

  • Crop growth (wheat and soybean biomass at 3+ season timepoints, plant height, node number, etc.)

  • Crop development (wheat and soybean stage progression)

  • Light (canopy coverage and light interception)

  • Weeds (density, species, and stage)

  • Soil characterization

Preliminary Results (2024-2025 season)
  • 25% less wheat yielded only 10% less (good compensation potential with tillers in edge rows along gaps)

  • Relay soybean yields were equal or better than double-crop yields

  • Relay soybean yields were reduced compared to monocrop soybean yields

  • Earlier planting dates were best for relay and monocrop soybeans

  • Weed control by wheat was noticeable (added competition could reduce herbicide needs)

​

2025 yield results are shown below. Yields are the average of replicated plots at each location. Yields with the same letter indicate that there was not a significant difference for that crop x location combination. (For example, all soybean yields were statistically similar in Ottawa, regardless of system - all "a"s)

Location
Treatment
Yield (bu/ac)
Yield (bu/ac)
Soybean
Wheat
Manhattan
Monocrop soybean
58.4 a
-
Relay intercropping
49.8 b
44.5 (skip) b
Double cropping
31.1 c
49.1 (solid) a
Ottawa
Monocrop soybean
58.0 a
-
Relay intercropping
54.5 a
74.4 (skip) b
Double cropping
52.1 a
82.8 (solid) a
Scandia
Monocrop soybean
44.2 a
-
Relay intercropping
28.0 b
34.4 (skip) b
Double cropping
19.5 c
42.6 (solid) a
Funding Acknowledgement

This research is generously funded by a multiregional Soybean Checkoff grant and North Central SARE project GNC25-408.

image.png
image.png
Photo Gallery

©2025 by Rachel L. Veenstra Cott, Ph.D.

bottom of page